Antwort auf den Beitrag "Re:Nochmal zum Thema Gebäudeeinsturz" posten:
Nickname:
Passwort:
Thema:
Nachricht:
>Hier mal eine Zusammenfassung und Übersetzung via ChatGPT, der Artikel kursiert gerade hier in Thailand: > > >[img:https://i.postimg.cc/J46fy5F3/20250331-120901.jpg] > > >[img:https://i.postimg.cc/P5f17mf7/file-000000008d4851f6ba5f69179dbaf4be-conversation-id-67ea2154-0820-800b-8674-8aacf73e3ca1-message-i.png] > >--- > >Title: Media & Public Dig into SAO Building Collapse Scandal > >Summary: > >A newly constructed 30-story building of Thailand’s State Audit Office (SAO), costing over 2 billion baht, collapsed following tremors from an earthquake in Myanmar. The incident raised serious suspicions, as hundreds of high-rise buildings in Bangkok stood firm while this one, not yet even furnished or in use, crumbled — killing dozens of workers. > >Key Points: > >1. Suspicious Integrity > >The collapse has led the public and media to question the building's construction quality, transparency, and safety standards. > > >2. “Integrity Pact” Controversy > >Government projects over 1 billion baht should fall under an “Integrity Pact,” inviting citizen watchdogs to monitor procurement and prevent corruption. > >SAO claimed this project did join the pact, but the Anti-Corruption Organization of Thailand said they were invited only after contracts and designs were finalized — rendering their role meaningless. > > >3. Contractor Scrutiny > >The project was awarded to a joint venture of China Railway No. 10 and Italian-Thai Development. > >Public concern arose about the Chinese partner: the Thai co-owners seem to be regular people with no construction background. They hold stakes in multiple companies, leading to suspicions they may be nominees for foreign ownership. > > >4. Dubious Office Location > >The registered address of China Railway No. 10 was a rundown 4-story townhouse used by nine different companies, all connected to the same individuals. > >The sign outside even misspelled “China” as “Chaina,” raising serious concerns over legitimacy. > > >5. Pride of China? > >Chinese media had previously celebrated this building as the company’s “first landmark overseas project.” > >After the collapse, most related Chinese articles and posts were wiped from the internet. > >This wasn’t their first Thai government contract — in 2019, they built another state office worth 716 million baht, only a year after their registration in 2018. > > >6. Document Smuggling Allegation > >Thai media reported Chinese staff were caught sneaking out over 30 files related to the construction from the collapsed site. > >Police intervened. The workers claimed they were retrieving documents for insurance claims. > > >7. Extravagant Spending > >Procurement records show shockingly high furniture costs: > >Chair for the meeting room president: 97,900 baht (Italian leather) > >Governor’s desk: 105,500 baht > >Sofa: 165,000 baht (another one gold-plated) > >Dining table: 90,000 baht (excluding chairs) > >Carpet (6x5.5m): 165,000 baht > > >All this despite the building being unfinished and unused, funded by taxpayers. > > >Conclusion: > >The SAO, whose job is to audit government spending, is now under fire for potentially failing its own accountability standards. Public sentiment is calling for the agency to “audit itself.” > > >---
mailbenachrichtigung?